Range Map
Origin: → · two fingers to move map
Payload vs. Range
Fuel on board
Cargo
nm
Range
Trip Preview
Name a destination in the map header above and this becomes your trip: time en route, what you burn, what it costs, and whether you get there without stopping — at the load you have set.
→
Over max payload by . At this load it cannot lift a single occupant. Please adjust your payload inputs.
We do not have a cruise speed on file for this aircraft, so there is no honest time or cost to give you for this leg.
En route
Fuel burned
Direct cost
Fuel cost
Tanks run dry about past before at this burn.
Mission Profile
- High-Performance
- Complex
- High-Altitude
- Pressurization
- Multi-Engine
Estimated Ownership Costs
Create a free account to view or request ownership cost data.
About the Aero Commander 680FP
Type certificated 1962 Source: FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet
Overview
The Aero Commander 680FP, marketed as the Pressurized Commander, is the pressurised non-stretched member of the 680F airframe family, certificated in 1962 under FAA Type Certificate 2A4. It sits in the cabin-class piston-twin segment, sharing the high-wing layout, retractable tricycle gear, and twin Lycoming IGSO-540 geared-and-supercharged powerplants common to the late-piston Aero Commander line. With a 5.0 psi pressurisation differential, the 680FP gave 1960s owner-flown and corporate operators a way to cruise above weather in a piston twin without stepping up to the cost or runway demands of an early turbine.
The airframe is the same fuselage cross-section and wing as the 680F, with reinforced structure and pressurisation plumbing replacing the unpressurised cabin. Production was modest. The variant overlapped with the stretched, unpressurised 680FL Grand Commander, and Aero Commander effectively asked buyers to choose between volume and altitude comfort. Most surviving 680FPs are now in the hands of operators who specifically want pressurisation in this airframe class and have access to a shop comfortable with the IGSO-540.
For a GA buyer evaluating one today, the 680FP is a niche acquisition. The cabin is comfortable, the systems are 1960s-typical (engine-driven pressurisation source, mechanical controls), and the mission envelope, mid-200s KTAS in the high teens to low 20s, is genuinely useful for regional business travel. The economics are dominated by the powerplants and the pressurisation system, both of which reward disciplined ownership and punish deferred maintenance.
Key Features for GA Buyers
- Pressurised cabin in a piston twin. Roughly 5.0 psi differential allows a 10,000 ft cabin near the mid-20s service ceiling, a comfort tier most piston twins do not reach.
- Cabin-class layout with airstair door. Seven-place cabin with a center aisle and walk-in entry; meaningfully more space and easier loading than light cabin twins of the same era.
- High-wing visibility and ramp presence. Unobstructed sightlines for passengers, simple wing-mounted fuel architecture, and an iconic profile that retains owner appeal.
- Capable useful load. Roughly 2,900 lb useful load on an 8,500 lb MTOW supports realistic four-to-six-occupant trips with bags and IFR fuel reserves.
- Twin Commander-supported type lineage. The Twin Commander Aircraft organization remains active in supporting the broader Commander line; parts and tribal knowledge for the airframe systems are still reachable through that channel.
Trade-offs
- IGSO-540 powerplant complexity. Geared, supercharged Lycoming sixes demand specific operating technique and overhaul shops with current experience; both are scarcer and more expensive than parallel-valve TIO-540 equivalents.
- Pressurisation adds a maintenance domain. Door seals, outflow valves, and structural fatigue items are inspection items the unpressurised 680FL does not carry, a real annual-cost delta that should be modeled, not assumed away.
- Modest production run, thin parts pool. The 680FP was built in small numbers relative to the 680FL Grand Commander and 500-series siblings; some airframe-specific parts require fabrication or salvage sourcing.
- Modest cruise efficiency for the operating cost. True airspeeds in the mid-200s KTAS at high power settings come at IGSO-540 fuel burns; a Beech King Air 90 in the same mission is faster, simpler to operate, and better supported, at a higher acquisition price.
- Cabin volume trades against pressurisation. The 680FL gives meaningfully more cabin length without pressurisation at the same MTOW class; buyers should be honest about whether the mission requires pressurised flight or whether the stretched cabin is the better answer.
See Also
- Aero Commander 680FL – Sister variant; stretched 44-inch fuselage, unpressurised; the cabin-vs-pressurisation trade within the family. Compare
- Beechcraft Queen Air B80 – Most direct external comparison; identical IGSO-540 powerplant on an unpressurised low-wing airframe. Compare
- Beechcraft King Air 90 – Turbine step-up for the same regional cabin-class mission, with simpler PT6 operation and pressurisation. Compare
- Aero Commander 560 – Predecessor mid-size cabin twin in the Commander line. Compare
- Aero Commander 500 – Smaller-cabin family base of the 500/520/560/680 TCDS lineage. Compare
Technical Specifications
Dimensions & Weights
- Height
- 14 ft
- Length
- 37 ft
- Parking area (ft²2)
- 2,466 ft²
- Max Takeoff Weight
- 8,500 lbs
- Useful Load
- 2,900 lbs
- Fuel Capacity
- 223 gal
Performance
- Cruise Speed
- Source: manufacturer figure 191 KTAS
- Never-Exceed (VNE)
- Source: FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet 250 KIAS
- Max Structural Cruise (VNO)
- Source: FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet 200 KIAS
- Approach Speed
- 97 KIAS
- Stall, Clean (VS1)
- 75 KIAS
- Range
- 1200 NM
- Service Ceiling
- 28,000 ft
- Rate of Climb
- 500 - 1000 fpm
Engines
Log in to view or request powerplant data.
Sources
Where the figures on this page come from. Aero Commander 680FP specifications are traced to published references; estimated values are flagged inline next to the figure.
Similar to the Aero Commander 680FP
Similar PistonsRockwell Commander 685
Piper PA-31P Pressurized Navajo
Piper PA-31P-350 Mojave
Cessna 335
Compare the Aero Commander 680FP to other aircraft