Commander 690

Turboprop • twin engine • High Wing • Retractable gear

Range Visualization

Origin: · click map to move · nm at current load

Payload vs. Range

Customize assumptions

Default: 190 lbs (FAA standard)

Default: 30 lbs

Passengers
lbs @ lbs / pax
0 lbs
Fuel on board
gal
+ Weight
Range
Available Range / nm
Mission capable — Aircraft can handle the current load with full fuel tanks.
Fuel tradeoff required — You'll need to leave gallons of fuel behind ( gal usable for nm range).
Over max gross weight — Reduce payload by lbs to safely operate this aircraft.

Mission Profile

Endorsements & ratings:
  • High-Performance
  • Complex
  • High-Altitude
  • Pressurization
  • Multi-Engine
  • Instrument
279
KTAS
Cruise Speed
7
Occupants
1419
nm
Max Range
1607
lbs
Wet Payload

Estimated Ownership Costs

Create a free account to view or request ownership cost data.

About the Commander 690

Overview

The Rockwell Commander 690B is the matured form of the Commander 690 turboprop series, produced from 1976 to 1979 and certified under FAA TCDS 2A4. It is a pressurized, high-wing, twin-turboprop cabin-class aircraft powered by two Honeywell (originally Garrett AiResearch) TPE-331-5-251K engines, each rated at roughly 717 shaft horsepower and driving three-blade Hartzell propellers. About 217 airframes were built.

The 690 family traces directly back to the piston Aero Commander 680 line: when Aero Commander engineers shopped for more performance than the IGSO-540 supercharged piston engine could give, the choice was the then-new Garrett TPE-331 single-shaft turboprop. The 690 added a fully pressurized cabin, a redesigned wing with the engines moved further outboard, and modern turbine reliability to an airframe whose stout high-wing layout was already a known quantity in U.S. business and utility flying. The 690B refined that recipe with a higher MTOW (10,325 lb), better soundproofing, an internal lavatory, and minor systems updates.

For a buyer evaluating one today, the 690B sits in a narrow band of the used-turboprop market: faster than a King Air 90, smaller and cheaper than a King Air 200, and arguably better-mannered in cruise than a Mitsubishi MU-2. The high wing buys ground clearance, easy cabin access, and unobstructed views from passenger seats, but the airplane is unambiguously a serious turbine that wants two crew and a Type Rating-grade approach to systems management.

Fleet support is the single most important contextual fact. Twin Commander Aircraft LLC (the type-club and TCDS holder) actively maintains the type with the Service Center network, mandatory inspection guidance, and the long-running Grand Renaissance airframe refurbishment program. A 690B that has been kept current at a Twin Commander Service Center is meaningfully more operable than one that has not.

Key Features for GA Buyers

  • Turbine reliability with serious cabin. Pressurized to 5.2 psi for a sea-level cabin to roughly 12,000 ft, a 31,000 ft service ceiling, and twin Garrett TPE-331-5s with a 5,400-hour TBO under current Honeywell SOAP/CAM programs. Real all-weather, IFR-without-asterisks transport.
  • Cruise that earns the fuel burn. Normal cruise of about 279 KTAS at FL200 and up to 284 KTAS at lower altitudes, with a 1,419 NM long-range cruise range at 45-minute reserve. Mission profile competes with a King Air B200 at materially lower acquisition cost.
  • High-wing utility. Long, unobstructed cabin entry; props well clear of the ground for unimproved-field operations; passenger sightlines that piston-twin and Beech-cabin buyers immediately notice. Useful load of about 4,180 lb leaves room for full fuel plus six adults and bags.
  • Type-club support is real. Twin Commander Aircraft LLC maintains an active Service Center network, factory-supported continued airworthiness program, and the Grand Renaissance refurbishment line. Type-specific recurrent training is widely available – not a given on a 1970s turboprop.
  • Strong short-field numbers for the weight class. About 2,259 ft takeoff and 2,084 ft landing over a 50 ft obstacle at sea level, with an initial climb rate near 2,849 fpm at MTOW. The Commander gets in and out of airfields that nominally belong to lighter airplanes.

Trade-offs

  • TPE-331 hot-section economics. The -5-251K is a single-shaft engine with a well-documented but expensive maintenance profile – hot-section inspection roughly every 1,800 hours, full overhaul at 5,400, and labor-intensive negative-torque-system and fuel-control attention. Budget for engine reserves accordingly; this is not a Pratt PT6 in cost behavior.
  • Single-shaft start and handling discipline. TPE-331 starts require deliberate technique; mismanaged starts are a known way to ruin a hot section in seconds. Type-specific training is non-negotiable for a new-to-type owner.
  • Cabin is comfortable, not large. Typical executive seating is 2 crew plus 5 passengers (the certification allows up to 10 in a commuter layout, but that is rare in surviving airframes). Cabin height about 4 ft 5 in – adequate, not stand-up.
  • Aging avionics in many airframes. Many 690Bs still fly with 1970s panels unless they have been through a major upgrade or the Renaissance program. Plan on $150k-$400k for a modern Garmin or Collins panel if the airplane has not had one.
  • Fuel burn at altitude. Roughly 70-90 gph combined in cruise depending on power setting and altitude. The -5 engines are less efficient than the later -10 dash that flies on the 690C/D and 695-series; if mission economics matter, the -10 conversions sold by Twin Commander Service Centers are worth pricing.
  • Parts and AD currency. The TCDS is mature and the type has a long AD history (wing spar, flight-control attach hardware, and others). A pre-buy at a Twin Commander Service Center, not a generalist shop, is the only sensible approach.

See Also

  • Aero Commander 680FL – Piston-Commander predecessor; the high-wing IGSO-540 piston twin that the 690 turboprop grew out of. Compare
  • Gulfstream Jetprop Commander 1000 – Stretched, re-engined successor; the 695A with TPE-331-10s and a longer cabin is the natural step-up for buyers who need more. Compare
  • Mitsubishi MU-2B-60 Marquise – Direct era competitor; the other 1970s pressurized cabin-class twin on TPE-331 power, with a very different handling reputation. Compare
  • Beech King Air 90 – Direct era competitor; the canonical PT6-powered alternative at similar size and cabin – Garrett vs Pratt economics in one comparison. Compare
  • Piper Cheyenne II – Direct era competitor; PT6A-28-powered low-wing alternative at similar mission and seat count. Compare

Technical Specifications

Dimensions

Wingspan
46.55 ft
Length
44.35 ft
Height
14.95 ft
Parking area (ft2)
2790.74 ft2

Weights

Max Takeoff Weight
10,325 lbs
Max Landing Weight
9,675 lbs
Useful Load
4,180 lbs
Fuel Capacity
384 gal

Performance

Cruise Speed
279 KTAS
Never-Exceed (Vne)
246 KIAS
Approach Speed
97 KIAS
Stall, Clean (Vs1)
82 KIAS
Range
1419 NM
Service Ceiling
31,000 ft
Rate of Climb
2849 fpm
Takeoff over 50 ft obstacle
2,259 ft
Landing ground roll
2,084 ft

Engines

Sign in to view or request powerplant data.

Similar to the Commander 690

Piper Cheyenne II silhouette

Piper Cheyenne II

Cruise
283 kts (higher than this aircraft)
Range
1350 nm (lower than this aircraft)
Seats
7
Turboprop twin engine Low Wing
Compare

See how the Commander 690 stacks up against similar aircraft

External Media

Cookies and analytics. We use Mixpanel and Google Analytics to understand how this site is used. Mixpanel records session replays (interaction patterns, scroll, and click timing). Page content is masked: we do not see what you read or type. Cookies are set only if you accept. Read our privacy policy.