Cessna 150

Piston • single engine • High Wing • Fixed gear

Range Visualization

Origin: · click map to move · nm at current load

Payload vs. Range

Customize assumptions

Default: 190 lbs (FAA standard)

Default: 30 lbs

Passengers
lbs @ lbs / pax
0 lbs
Fuel on board
gal
+ Weight
Range
Available Range / nm
Mission capable — Aircraft can handle the current load with full fuel tanks.
Fuel tradeoff required — You'll need to leave gallons of fuel behind ( gal usable for nm range).
Over max gross weight — Reduce payload by lbs to safely operate this aircraft.

Mission Profile

107
KTAS
Cruise Speed
2
Occupants
420
nm
Max Range
322
lbs
Wet Payload

Estimated Ownership Costs

Create a free account to view or request ownership cost data.

About the Cessna 150

Overview

The Cessna 150 is a two-seat, fixed-gear, high-wing trainer produced from 1958 to 1977, with roughly 23,000 built across all variants. It is the predecessor to the Cessna 152 and one of the most produced light aircraft in history. For two decades it was the default primary trainer at flight schools across North America and much of the world, and thousands remain airworthy today.

Powered by the Continental O-200, a 100 HP four-cylinder carbureted engine, the 150 is simple, slow, and reliable. It is not a cross-country aircraft. It is a machine for learning to fly, for local flying, and for pilots who want the lowest possible cost of ownership in a certificated airframe. Later variants include the aerobatic A150 Aerobat, and the 150M which introduced the controversial “Commuter” squared wingtips and revised cabin. Earlier models (pre-1966) had straight tails; the swept tail appeared with the 150F and became the defining look of the type.

Key Features for GA Buyers

The lowest cost of entry in certificated aviation. Airworthy 150s regularly trade for $15,000 to $30,000. Fuel burn is approximately 5 GPH on the Continental O-200, annual inspections are straightforward on a simple fixed-gear airframe with no complex systems, and the O-200 carries a 1,800-hour TBO. For a pilot building hours or a flight school operating on a budget, the total cost of ownership is hard to beat.

Forgiving handling. The 150’s high wing, wide CG envelope, and benign stall behaviour were deliberate design choices for a trainer. Stalls are well-mannered and recoverable; the aircraft is stable and predictable in all normal flight regimes. These qualities also make it accessible for low-time pilots who have just earned their certificate.

Fleet size and parts support. With 23,000 examples built and a large portion still flying, the 150 has one of the most developed maintenance ecosystems in general aviation. Parts are widely available, mechanics know the type well, and owner communities are active.

Aerobat variant. The A150 Aerobat is stressed to +6/-3g and approved for spins, loops, chandelles, and lazy eights. It is one of the most affordable certificated aerobatic platforms available, and a legitimate option for pilots pursuing aerobatic training or a spin endorsement.

Trade-offs

  • Narrow cabin. The 150’s fuselage is tight by any measure: 39 inches wide at the shoulders. Pilots above roughly 6 feet or 200 lbs will find the aircraft uncomfortable on anything longer than a local flight, and two large adults will be pressed against each other for the duration.
  • Low useful load. MTOW is 1,600 lbs and typical OEW runs around 1,100 lbs, leaving approximately 478 lbs of useful load. With full fuel (26 gallons usable, 156 lbs), the remaining payload is around 322 lbs: barely enough for two average adults with no baggage. Weight and balance planning is essential every flight.
  • 100LL fuel requirement. The Continental O-200 is not mogas-STC’d in the same way the Lycoming O-235 in the 152 can be. Owners at fields where 100LL is expensive or scarce face higher operating costs.
  • Performance at density altitude. 670 FPM sea-level climb rate sounds adequate until you need it on a hot summer afternoon at a high-elevation airport. The 150 is a low-and-slow aircraft; density altitude deserves respect.
  • Age. The youngest Cessna 150 is now over 48 years old. Corrosion, fabric condition on control surfaces, and the accumulated maintenance history of a high-cycle training aircraft all require scrutiny in any pre-purchase inspection.

See Also

  • Cessna 152 – the direct successor; Lycoming O-235-L2C with longer TBO, same airframe, slightly more power
  • Piper PA-38 Tomahawk – the primary contemporary competitor; low-wing design, more responsive handling, similar mission
  • Beechcraft 77 Skipper – another late-1970s two-seat trainer; less common but shares the budget-trainer niche
  • Luscombe 8 – a vintage alternative; tailwheel, all-metal construction, appealing to pilots seeking a classic aircraft
  • Grumman American AA-1 – a more responsive two-seater; faster and more slippery than the 150, with a different handling character

Technical Specifications

Dimensions

Wingspan
33.2 ft
Length
23.9 ft
Height
8.5 ft

Weights

Max Takeoff Weight
1,600 lbs
Max Landing Weight
1,600 lbs
Useful Load
478 lbs
Fuel Capacity
26 gal

Performance

Cruise Speed
107 KTAS
Range
420 NM
Service Ceiling
14,000 ft
Rate of Climb
670 fpm

Engines

Sign in to view or request powerplant data.

Similar to the Cessna 150

No similar aircraft found

Ready to Compare Aircraft?

See how the Cessna 150 stacks up against similar aircraft